- 14-year-old rapist-murdered sentenced to 15 years (12/24/2003)
- Minor gets 15 years for rape and murder of 5-year-old girl (12/24/2003)
Wednesday, January 14, 2004
Case of the Unnamed Fourteen year-old Rapist
Case of the Unnamed Fourteen year-old Rapist
Tel Aviv, Israel
Convicted and sentenced a 14-year-old boy to 15 years in prison and three years of probation for the rape and murder of a five-year-old girl.
Disclaimer: Inclusion in this website does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement. Individuals must decide for themselves if the resources meet their own personal needs.
Table of Contents:
14-year-old rapist-murdered sentenced to 15 years
Ha Aretz - December 24, 2003
The Tel Aviv District Court, acting as a juvenile court, on Wednesday sentenced a 14-year-old boy to 15 years in prison and three years of probation for the rape and murder of a five-year-old girl.
On March 31 of this year, the girl was sent by her mother to a grocery store to buy sugar.
The defendant, who worked in the store, grabbed the girl after she left the store, dragged her back in and raped her. When she started calling for help, he stabbed her 31 times and killed her.
The judges stated in their decision that the defendant's life circumstances, as rough as they may have been, cannot justify such a abominable murder.
Minor gets 15 years for rape and murder of 5-year-old girl
By Assaf Bergerfreund
Ha'Aretz - December 25, 2003
A 14-year-old boy was sentenced yesterday by the Tel Aviv District Court to 15 years in jail for the murder and rape of a 5-year-old girl. A three-judge panel ruled that "the boy's young age and minor status cannot provide him immunity against punishment."
The judges stressed in their ruling that the harsh circumstances of the youth's life could not justify such a heinous murder.
The murder took place some nine months ago, when the young girl was sent by her mother to a grocery store owned by the youth's father to buy sugar. After leaving the store, she was chased by the youth, who caught her, picked her up against her will and forced her into his room adjacent to the store.
The youth then sodomized the child, who began crying and calling for help. Unable to silence the girl, the youth ran to the kitchen, grabbed a knife and stabbed her to death 31 times. He then dumped the body outside, telling his brother of his actions a few hours later. The brother reported the incident to the police.
The dilemma facing Judges Saviona Roth-Levy, Avraham Tal and Ofra Salomon Cherniak with regard to the punishment to impose on the youth centered on the provisions of the Juvenile Law that stipulate that a minor under the age of 14 cannot be sentenced to time in prison. The youth confessed to the crimes that were committed before he turned 14, but sentencing was passed with him aged 14 years and five months.
The State Prosecution had requested that he be sentenced to serve six years in a closed institution till the age of 20, plus another 3.5 years for the sexual crime he committed. The youth's defense lawyer asked the court to waive the jail sentence and suffice with the six years in a juvenile institution.
The judges, however, rejected both the prosecution's and the defense's positions, and decided to place their emphasis on the punishment, ruling that they were unable to adopt a position that related only the youth's personal circumstances.
In their ruling, the judges wrote that in such an instance, they were required to take into account the elements of deterrence and public safety. "Adopting a forgiving attitude toward crimes of murder committed by minors would constitute contempt for human life - the life of the victim," the judges wrote.
FAIR USE NOTICE
Some of the information on The Awareness Center's web pages may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml . If you wish to use copyrighted material from this update for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.